Love it or hate it Library 2.0 has changed the way librarians think about library service. Those who are reluctant of Library 2.0 may be afraid that it will be all technology all the time, but in actuality one of the fundamental principles of Library 2.0 recommends only as much technology (if any at all) as our users demand. For me, is the heart of Library 2.0, creating an open and ongoing dialogue with our users, staff, and community to better understand what is worth our time, our patron’s time, and precious library dollars.
We have talked about the “core values of librarianship” in our introductory courses (701 in particular) and I think that Library 2.0 takes those same ideals, but reconfigures them by striving for a user-centered, rather than a library or librarian-centered experience.
A focus on service has always been a central part of librarianship, but the critical part of Library 2.0 suggests that our service to patrons should be directed by the user, switching the focus from just offering good service and expanding our definition to include to participatory service, a service model described by Casey and Savastinuk as one in “which both users and nonusers can participate in the service creation process” (p.62) Ultimately, what Library 2.0 and participatory service suggests is putting our users in the drivers seat and the librarian becomes the navigator.
This is not stay librarians should stop developing collections, scheduling programming, and making reading suggestions. But, allowing our users to comment on their favorite books, instead of always hearing from us, offering comic book and graphic novel clubs, instead of the usual book group for teens, or providing gaming at the library whether it be monopoly or rock band to patrons of all ages helps us connect with patrons on their terms and allows patrons a level of autonomy in their library experience.
Honestly, I have never been a fan of the name “Library 2.0.” In fact, I think libraries have gone through many more “upgrades” that the 2.0 would suggest. But, name aside I think that we are going to see the principles of Library 2.0 interwoven with the core values of librarianship and that we are taking one of our most essential core values – service – and reconfiguring and redefining it to better serve our patrons wherever they may be.
A final thought, as I finished writing this post I began reading Tribes by Seth Godin. From the onset Godin suggests, “The real power of tribes [people connected to each other through a common idea] has nothing to do with the Internet and everything to do with people” (p.6). The same logic could be applied to Library 2.0, insofar as the strength of Library 2.0 has little to do with the Internet but rather the relationships we cultivate with our library tribe of patrons, staff, and community.